rhetorical question about marriage

Marriage is not a piece of paper, wedding, or ring. To God, however, divorce is a sin, no matter what the causes or circumstances, or who is the guilty party or who is the innocent party. Share patient's GPS location with designated Emergency contact. “Holiness” means “distinct, set apart, separate” to God. Judgment for this kind of sin applied to everyone, rich or poor, leader or follower. The final section is clearly set off as a warning for those who are in a marriage. In the fantasy scenario crafted, there is no society, no Church, no witness, and no hope of getting back to civilization, apparently. One who is treacherous is a traitor, unreliable and disloyal; and a traitor is dangerous. The brook provided water, as the text explains, so that people became dependent on it. Malachi begins by laying down a principle: although Israel was created by one Father, they were guilty of treachery against the covenant. To do this involves two very important considerations: knowing and agreeing with the plan of the covenant God has made for the people of God, and knowing and agreeing with what God has planned for the marriage. Child marriage is known to take place across a wide range of communities, ethnicities and religions. A rhetorical analysis of the essay can provide an effective understanding of Brady’s mind in narration. is that they are not asked, and are not understood, as ordinary information-seeking questions, but as making some kind of claim, or assertion, an assertion of the opposite polarity to that of the question." John W. Lv 6. His message follows two major sins, first the divorces, and then the marriages to foreign women. In the essay “I Want a Wife” by Judy Brady, the speaker uses satire to explain the absurdity of the expectations placed on a wife in 1970s America. The scenario offered is that there are no witnesses, hence my opinion that there can be no valid marriage. They must understand its purpose if they are going to preserve it. In marriages there will be fallings from the ideal for sure; the marriage may be strained and thinned by friction, or marred and spoiled by a gross contempt for its moral meaning; but the failures and abuse do not destroy or degrade the ideal. God wanted a nation; he could have chosen and formed others, or more. But the principle as it will be related to marriage is well summarized by Hengstenberg: The one who annulled the distinction between an Israelite and a heathen woman proved by this very action that he had already annihilated the distinction between the God of Israel and the idols of the heathen, that he no longer had the theocratic consciousness of God (Christologie, III:381). Perhaps rephrase the question. 3:9). If His Church decrees that there must be a witness, then I would not assume I could be validly married without one. It accords with the dictates of nature and the laws of divine inspiration. However, the greatest question is why she wanted to have a wife. One thing is clear, the two different ideas in it are opposites, and so the expression forms a figure of speech (a merism)--everyone from the waker to the answerer. A powerful teaching aid, rhetorical questions are often used in the Bible. An example is... | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples Rather, each passage comes from a particular set of circumstances or a particular question. Did they not learn from their history and their exile? Marriage is not a piece of paper, wedding, or ring. What does it mean when it says God hates it? there's the old rhetorical question : "Would you buy a car without test driving it first? Malachi says, “May the LORD cut off … .” This is not an announcement of doom; it is an imprecation of the prophet as if to say the people deserve this judgment. The outward sign of dedication to the LORD was betrayed by the treachery of uniting with paganism in marriage. What then is the one? But now, these women were being cast aside as an old garment for something new and fresh and exciting, but thoroughly pagan. Marrying an idolatrous woman was one thing; but dumping a legitimate wife for her is another. Malachi’s reference to their creator as “father” recalls the language of Malachi 1:6, “Is not God our father?” And the use of “father” recalls the covenant relationship that God established in Egypt and confirmed by covenant at Sinai (“let my son go”; see Exod. (Irene Koshik, Beyond Rhetorical Questions.John Benjamins, 2005) It cannot be ignored, because it stands there as a witness. Moving from the general description, the prophet now identified the exact problem. Dr Ross joined the faculty of Beeson Divinity School in 2002 as Beeson Professor of Old Testament and Hebrew. She was not only the wife of his youth, but his comrade, his partner. Now she had become the scorn and loathing of his later years. Ultimately, it is about your happiness. It would be normal to think of Genesis 2 because Adam and Eve were to be “one flesh.” God could have done it differently--he had the residue of the Spirit, that is, he had all the resources and options available. 0 0. Still, child marriage is much more common in the developing world because one of the main driving factors is poverty. If reconciliation was possible, it was to be pursued; if not, then the people had to accept responsibility for their acts, find forgiveness and healing from God, and get on with their lives--like any other person forgiven and restored. She was not a servant or a slave; she was a partner. I'm trying to be purely logical, or if I can't, then telling the other person that I'm just in rebound-mode. And it will take such diligence because the way of the world is so different. Who stood to be so “cut off” by God? Perhaps with the reference to the “tents” we can get the idea of watchmen at either end of the camp, one calling out and the other answering. 3 Answers. Gay marriage will not renew marriage’s central public role because committed, loving gays and lesbians intend to abide by the same principles on which the institution of marriage … The general statement is given first: “the man who does this.” Then the specifics: “him that wakes and him that answers.” There are many suggested interpretations for this difficult phrase. After all, Peter reminded all Christian men to treat their wives with respect as joint heirs of the covenant “so that nothing will hinder [their] prayers” (1 Pet. Here’s a quick and simple definition:Some additional key details about rhetorical questions: 1. Malachi was dealing with a situation where a good number of men got rid of their Hebrew wives and married pagan women. In this type, the rhetorical question is viewed as a rhetorical affirmation, in which another question is asked with an intention to express obviousness or certainty of a situation. In the modern world the dissolution of a marriage is rarely considered a sin; rather, it is an option that may be taken to avoid difficulties or tensions. Whatever was there that fit the description of “holy matrimony” had now become nothing more than a “common coupling” or “profane fornication.”. But this is what we are seeing today, people entering all kinds of religious service with new marriages, never having admitted, let alone confessed, that there has been sin. . This was very harsh language; the sin must have had greater implications than, say, a couple not getting along and divorcing. So, in effect the men covered the altar with tears and sighing--not their tears, for they were cavalier about it all and thought God was pleased with their gifts, but with their wives’ tears, because by causing the pain the men were actually presenting their wives’ grief to God and not a sacrifice. Aporia comes in many forms but the most celebrated example is a quote from Shakespeare that almost everyone who went to school as quoted at least once. God established the marriage laws (Lev. Malachi was not yet through. 7 years ago. But in this modern day and age, no one is pressured into an arranged marriage. So I was wondering about something. As we shall see in these first three verses Malachi was actually condemning intermarriage with pagans; and these intermarriages gave the occasion for the divorces. But over here were their unfortunate wives, now abandoned, praying and crying to God for help. The highest rates of child marriage are seen in West and Central Africa, where over four in ten girls were married before age 18. Malachi also says that the wife is “your companion.” This adds to the treachery. And it's even rhetorical! 114:2). He mentioned Israel, Judah, and Jerusalem in order. After the captivity many folks got carried away with their freedom. Hence, both parties need to … She makes her audience think of the need for marriage. Moreover, most of the time both parties have some involvement. The word has a use in Job that illustrates the meaning. Sex without that is sin. 3:7). They, of course, might choose to take their chances and rely on God understanding their predicament and intentions, but His work outside of the sacraments is a mystery, while His work within the sacraments is dogma. Best to trust in dogma in this case. Best to trust in dogma in this case. He ratified its contract; he guarded its obligations; he expounded its laws; and he graced its celebration with his presence. The two thoughts center on the meaning of “one” and the “residue of the Spirit”: “Did he not make one, even though he had the residue of the spirit? The sin is introduced as a “treachery” before the sin is defined. In the Jewish writings the verb came to mean “act violently, faithlessly, and rebel.” So the people had been unfaithful to God, traitors to the covenant. Malachi’s message was similar to that of Ezra and Nehemiah; but he alone focused on the pain all this caused and on the fact that God hates it. Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?” Romans 6:1 ANSWER: “God forbid. Unfortunately, after the … Support for this view comes from the fact that the Lord loves Zion (Ps. You did misread, but it could have been my wording. It combines the earthly interest, fortunes, and happiness of two people, a man and a woman, and it influences the destiny of many others. Here is the rebuke of a prophet most forceful and precise; here is pastoral counseling at its best. 3 Answers. Answer Save. If we are to look to the institution of marriage for progress in truth, stability, and progress in society, then we will be disappointed. Answer Save. RHETORICAL QUESTION AND THEIR ANSWERS IN ROMANS RHETORICAL QUESTION: “What shall we say then? a question that is not asked in order to receive an answer from the audience or reader It is a way of adding style to your essay.. This should not surprise us. When The Sun Finally Rises: Wrestling With The Past (Gen. 32:22-32), 2. Examples and Observations "Something [rhetorical] questions all have in common . need a rhetorical question supporting gay marriage, please help What Malachi is doing is offering the quintessential reason for trying to keep a marriage together come what may--God hates divorce. Why did he choose one nation, Israel? So the message to the household of faith is clear: if you truly see how the marriage covenant fits the covenant God has made with his people, then you will marry within the faith and you will give all diligence to preserve that marriage come what may. It is a life term commitment before God to stay together. But a curse from the prophet was warning enough that if such sin was persisted in it would bring the penalty. The objective is to find a person you can grow old with, build a life with. No passage in the Bible deals with all the details of marriage and divorce. Jennifer Maggio is a national author and speaker who is also a wife, mother, and founder of The Life of a Single Mom Ministries. Ultimately, it is about your happiness. Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled, : The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. --to produce a godly seed in the earth. She was the wife of his youth, the one who had his first affections when they were the strongest, the one who probably gave him children, the one who had lived through it all with him. Of course you wouldn't." They were bound together as one in the eyes of God. Thus, yes, the sin of fornication would indeed be present if they engaged in sexual relations. Their replacing the garment of marriage, their vows of love and devotion to their wives, with acts of social abuse and emotional and even physical violence, God hated as well. But he chose one wife for one man. Of course you wouldn't." This second sin grew out of the first, for in finding and marrying pagan women they put away their primary wives by divorce. Thus, it would mean everyone, from one end of the settlement to the other. The ancient Athenians believed that success and charm of an individual depended on his rhetorical ability to speak and debate. When “hate” is used in contrast to “love” in passages, as it is in Malachi 1, it has the sense of “reject” and love would have the sense of “choose.” But when the word is used separately, as it is in this particular passage, it adds the idea of “to detest, abhor” to the rejection. The response of the men was again to challenge the word of the prophet: “Wherein have we dealt treacherously?” There is a cold defiance in the words of the people, a defiance that comes from a rationalized sin. To motivate diligence and care for the marriage, Malachi has included three warnings: 1) divorce and remarriage (especially to a pagan) destroys worship; 2) divorce and remarriage (especially to a pagan) hinders producing godly children; and 3) God hates divorce. I don’t know the specific rules, but it is my understanding that in such a circumstance, if you both pledge to God to be man and wife, then it is a valid marriage. Sorry to detract from the thread, but unless I am misreading what you wrote or intended to convey, it seems odd to say that an omniscient God might not understand something, including a person’s intentions. Such dedication is a delusion. It was a proud challenge to “his view.” They thought that if they did the worship routine well enough and gave to the sanctuary, they would be highly favored in the courts of heaven. It was an integral ingredient in the happiness of Eden, and so is an integral part of society. What do you think of the answers? The force of the verse lies in the idea of the treachery, which was paralleled with the word “abomination.” This makes it something that God loathes, something that is repugnant to God, and therefore tabu. Malachi delivered his burden to the people of Israel well after the time of the return and revivals of Ezra and Nehemiah, somewhere between 440 and 400 B.C. How do same sex marriages prophogate the speciers? Here were men, calloused and less than loyal to the historic faith, coming to the sanctuary with their impressive gifts of dedication and thanksgiving. They, of course, might choose to take their chances and rely on God understanding their predicament and intentions, but His work outside of the sacraments is a mystery, while His work within the sacraments is dogma. And since the message begins with the affirmation of the sovereignty of God, then the message is that unfaithfulness to the marriage in this way is disloyalty to God. The line is powerful: “I hate putting away.” Some of the ancient versions actually misinterpreted the line to say, “if a man hates his wife he should put her away.” But the context is against divorce, and an exception as wide as this would not fit. How effective is Brady's final rhetorical question? And it still is. Pagan intermarriage and the dissolution of good marriages would ruin the chance to do this. For example, he says, the “mothers instead of being able to work for their honest livelihood, are forced to employ all their time in strolling to beg sustenance for their helpless infants” (Swift, 831). She has been featured in hundreds of media venues, including The New York Times, The 700 Club, Power Women, Daystar Television, and others. A rhetorical question is asked merely for effect with no answer expected: "Marriage is a wonderful institution, but who would want to live in an institution?" Only in the strictest of religious settings. In one sense, your hypothetical is somewhat irrational. Even here it is not until the second half of the verse that it is clear what he is talking about. And we find no better description of this violation and its pain than in the Bible than in Malachi 2. Marriage is an institution of God. Marriage is a social institution. The interests of the couple united, the triumph of truth in their union, and the upward progress of humanity in their arena are all dependent on the preservation of God’s institution of marriage. Correct; there needs to be at least one witness. To give this gift along with the blood sacrifice would be the way to indicate gratitude for God’s provision and dedication of life to his service. The expression “wife of your youth” should be understood as “youthful wife,” the wife the man married when he was young and full of love and devotion and ambition and plans. These heightened the boldness of the sin--it was no marginal problem of people who had no biblical training; it was in the very center of the political and religious community. To fulfill the first one must be committed to worshiping and serving God in holiness and righteousness. That is what their hand produced, as Malachi put it. What did Malachi mean by “the holiness” of the Lord? That plan was simple and clear: one man and one woman becoming one flesh throughout their earthly lives, to produce a godly seed. The apostles caught the idea of their master, and invested it with mystic solemnity by presenting it as a type of the substantial, invisible and everlasting union existing between Christ and his bride, the church. He is the author of Introducing Biblical Hebrew and Grammar, Holiness to the Lord: A Guide to the Exposition of the Book of Leviticus, Creation and Blessing: A Guide to the Study and Exposit... More, 1. He takes them back to the marriage of their youth, a marriage covenant that God himself witnessed, and so one signed and sealed in heaven. When the Sun Sets: Jacob Meets God (Gen. 27:41-28:22). They cannot get validly married in that scenario, for although they technically administer the sacrament to one another, a priest and witnesses must be present. Similes and metaphors are familiar ways to convey complex ideas through language. These rhetorical questions aren't arguments; they're just inflammatory remarks which make the hidden assumption that heterosexual couples are worthy of marrying but homosexual couples are not. Brady uses pathos in her stylish language. Be on your guard against such treachery. It accords with the dictates of nature and the laws of divine inspiration. He hates it when they destroy their marriages, because he knows the pain that will cause, and the effect that will have on the faith for the future. A rhetorical question is one for which the questioner does not expect a direct answer: in many cases it may be intended to start a discourse, or as a means of displaying the speaker's or author's opinion on a topic.. A common example is the question "Can't you do anything right?" The main idea of the passage is clear: God planned that a man and a woman would become one, be partners, share everything, build a life together, and please God. From the very beginning of Genesis people have attempted to change God’s institution of marriage to suit their desires. Unfortunately, things have not turned out very well. The overall forgiveness process is the same: cleaning, healing, scar removal. It creates havoc with the society, violates the family, and spoils the covenant God loves. Relevance. Leaving a question lingering in the air will allow the reader to spend further time in contemplation. The verb “take heed” means “to watch carefully.” It calls for constant vigilance and concern, like a night watchman watching the city. 32:18; Isa. But the prophets wanted everyone to realize that the failure was a sin, and that to go ahead in life with God they first had to acknowledge that, or as we say, own it, at least own their part in something that fell short of the will of God. The Search Of The Wise Men (Matthew 2:1-12), Christmas Searches: Expository Sermons For Christmas, 3. In its uses for divine punishment, the verb “cut off” can be used for the death penalty at the hands of the people, for premature death at the hand of God, or excommunication from the religious community. It is a life term commitment before God to stay together. there's the old rhetorical question : "Would you buy a car without test driving it first? This kind of gift was not usually a blood sacrifice, but a gift of foods and produce. This is a reasonable question, but it appears to be an easy rhetorical question (eliciting an answer of “No!”) only because it obscures two very important factors. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” Romans 6:2 RHETORICAL QUESTION: “Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them […] the rhetorical question should be about if we are born with our identity or not. Hence the question. In either case, if some other priest or deacon who can be present is available, he must be called and be present at the celebration of the marriage together with the witnesses, without prejudice to the validity of the marriage before witnesses only. Her narration evokes feelings based on her reasoning towards marriage. Xper 1. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” Romans 6:2 RHETORICAL QUESTION: “Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them […] The two would have to be committed to the faith and to the training of children in it. First, Israel is called a holy nation (Deut. Try these road trip questions for couples too. Formally or informally, marriages were dissolved, because all these sins in one way or another affected the family. What we have in the book is a number of his messages; we have them because they are part of the divine revelation of God and timeless in their relevance. When they divorced and married women who worshiped false gods, Malachi presented their actions as a defilement of the holiness of the LORD. Producing a godly seed.” One view takes the “one” back to the creation of Eve with Adam. Nowhere do I have a teaching that presumes He Himself would serve as that witness in a post-Eden world. The prophet at this starting point speaks in general terms to get the people’s attention; when he has it, he narrows the focus to the actual sins involved. Introduction Marriage is an institution of God. And in the days of the prophets, a Malachi was there to declare the standard. What is a rhetorical question? Rhetorical questions are also sometimes called erotema. Just as man was not made for the Sabbath, neither was man made for the Sacraments. - i swear someone just asked that question on yahoo a …

Dyson Dc50 No Suction From Base, Zone 9b Planting Guide, Study Habits For Medical Students, Best For Eczema On Hands, What Do Tapeworms Do, Why Do I Still Feel Drunk After 2 Days,